CEEI (501c3 Idaho non-profit)
PO Box 1778
Sun Valley, ID 83353
Phone/Fax 208.578.1557
ceei@cox.net
Center for Environmental Education and Information
Category List Back
Major: * A BULLETIN RAINBOW COALITION SPEAKS OUT
Sub: (Click below)
No Subcategories found!
* A BULLETIN RAINBOW COALITION SPEAKS OUT

CEEI STAYS NEUTRAL in these disputes over the GW (global Warming ) and the AGW ( Anti global Warming). The Rainbow Coalition has every right to criticize the media. who are more concerned with media ratings than proofs. the fact IS that CEEI down loads almost 5000 line items a day about what is happening, puts them into 1500 CLIMATE categories and now has 9,000,000 archives, WE also believe in the mathematics of probability, particularly when it is coming from all over the world.

Google is only a machine, but if used wisely, it will also show the scientific community that they also have to share more information not less with the public particularly when govt political systems don't always make the right decisions.

CEEI uses Google because it works with what IS. It is not perfect. The universities and media should ask if they are economic ( in the market place) well not hardly, US print media is closing down and university model particularly in California is broke !
What do you tell your kids who were arrested for protesting a big increase in operate and maintain fees, About Tuition. ?
_______________________________________________________________________________________
THE RAINBOW COALITION IS BASED IN THE CARIBBEAN, Milton Ponson President.

In response to Eugene Shinn's contribution I would like to point out to what level the GW vs AGW war has sunk!

The AGW vs GW camps are each debating the scientific rigor of the other camp in providing proofs.

As
an environmentalist trained in mathematics I find the last twenty years
of science to have been invaded by pseudo-religion like thinking
coupled to appealing to cheap sentiments.

Right now as
mathematician I see the proofs making the case for GW outweigh those
for AGW, both in volume and in scope and in terms of quality of
scientific work.

According to some recent figures there are some
250,000 non-governmental organizations around the world dealing with
major environmental issues, nearly all of them dealing with either
biodiversity or climate change or both.

Both
fields require wading through vast amounts of reports to keep current
and in most cases we assume the reports to be based on good science.

Aside
from scientists either in the academe or in government agencies around
the world these organizations are the principal consumers of reports
and those together with the scientific community are responsible for
digesting and regurgitating the information in piecemeal chunks for the
general public.

Freedom of speech
and expression are not be confused with the practice of science, where
we deal in absolute truths (proofs), hypotheses and theories based on
rigid methods for observation, deduction and reproducible proofs.

The
realm of science is real, tangible and does not lend itself to
"reality-TV" interpretations of the real world, where perceptions and
dictated behaviors are presented to the viewers as reality.

The
AGW camp is presenting a "reality TV" view of science to the world,
with the perceptions and dictated behaviors orchestrated by those who
have vested interest in such.

But unlike the makers of reality
TV programming, the AGW camp is bent on not providing entertainment but
the rights of vested interests to damage the livelihoods and existence
of hundreds of millions around the world, in particular in coastal
zones and in island states.

But now the AGW camp has reached an all-time low in their endeavors to prove the GW scientists to be a conniving set of doomsday scenario promoters.

The email server of the Climate Research Institute in the UK was hacked and thousands of emails used "out of context" according to the scientists, owners of the email accounts.

See the following links;
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/21/science/earth/21climate.html?_r=1
http://www.canada.com/Hacked+mails+heat+climate+change+debate/2280452/story..html
National Geographic Image Collection/Annie Griffiths Belt